Good Health Medicine

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Health medicine
  • Dietary supplements
  • Dietary nutrition
  • Alternative medication
  • Medicine price

Good Health Medicine

Header Banner

Good Health Medicine

  • Home
  • Health medicine
  • Dietary supplements
  • Dietary nutrition
  • Alternative medication
  • Medicine price
Health medicine
Home›Health medicine›Food – Lifestyle – Illness – Health – Medicine – HRT – Hormone replacement therapy

Food – Lifestyle – Illness – Health – Medicine – HRT – Hormone replacement therapy

By Rebecca C. Myers
September 16, 2007
0
0


[ad_1]

Another thing that epidemiological studies have convincingly established is that wealth is associated with less heart disease and better health, at least in developed countries. Studies have not been able to establish why this is so, but this too is part of the problem of the healthy user and a possible confounding factor in the history of hormone therapy and many other associations. these epidemiologists are trying to study. George Davey Smith, who began his career studying how socioeconomic status is associated with health, says this research teaches one thing is that woes “come together.” Poverty is a disaster, and the poor are less educated than the rich; they smoke more and weigh more; they are more likely to have high blood pressure and other risk factors for heart disease, to eat what is affordable rather than what experts tell them healthy, to have poor medical care, and to live in environments with more pollutants, noise and stress. Ideally, epidemiologists will carefully measure the wealth and education of their subjects, and then use statistical methods to adjust for the effect of these influences – multiple regression analysis, for example, as such a method is called – but, as Avorn says, she “doesn’t always work as well as we would like.

Nursing investigators argued that differences in socioeconomic status cannot explain the associations they observe with HRT because all of their subjects are registered nurses and therefore this “controls” for variations in wealth and education. . Skeptics respond that even if all RNs had the same education and income, which is not necessarily the case, their socioeconomic status will be determined by whether they are married, how many children they have. have and their husband’s income. “All you have to do is watch the nurses,” says Petitti. “Some are married to CEOs of companies and others are unmarried and still live with their parents. It cannot be true that there is no socio-economic distribution among nurses. Stampfer says that since the publication of the results of the Women’s Health Initiative in 2002, investigators of the Nursing Health Study have gone back to their data to examine socioeconomic status “to the extent that we could.” – examining measures that could indirectly reflect wealth and social class. “It doesn’t seem plausible” that socioeconomic status could explain the association they observed, he said. But nurse investigators never released this analysis, so skeptics remained skeptical.

Compliance bias

An even more subtle component of healthy user bias needs to be addressed. This is the effect of conformity or adhesion. Quite simply, people who comply with their doctor’s orders when they receive a prescription are different and healthier than those who do not. This difference may ultimately be unquantifiable. The compliance effect is another plausible explanation for many of the beneficial associations that epidemiologists commonly report, meaning that this alone is reason to wonder if much of what we hear about what constitutes a diet and a healthy lifestyle is poorly designed.

The lesson comes from an ambitious clinical trial called the Coronary Drug Project, which was started in the 1970s to test whether any of five different drugs could prevent heart attacks. The subjects were some 8,500 middle-aged men with known heart problems. Two-thirds of them were randomized to take one of the five drugs and the other third a placebo. Because one of the drugs, clofibrate, lowered cholesterol levels, researchers had high hopes that it would ward off heart disease. But when the results were compiled after five years, the clofibrate showed no beneficial effects. The researchers then considered the possibility that clofibrate appeared to fail only because the subjects did not faithfully take their prescriptions.

It turned out that the men who reported taking more than 80 percent of the prescribed pills fared significantly better than those who did not. Only 15% of these loyal “adherents” died, compared with nearly 25% of what project researchers called “poor adherents”. This could have been taken as a reason to believe that clofibrate actually cut heart disease deaths nearly in half, but the researchers then looked at the men who faithfully took their placebos. And these men, too, seemed to gain by scrupulously respecting their prescription: only 15% of them died against 28% who were less conscientious. “So taking the placebo faithfully reduces the death rate by a factor of two,” said David Freedman, professor of statistics at the University of California, Berkeley. “How can that be? Well, people who take their placebo regularly are just different from the rest. The rest is a bit speculative. Maybe they take better care of themselves in general. But that conformity effect is a pretty big effect.

The moral of the story, says Freedman, is that any time epidemiologists compare people who faithfully engage in an activity with those who don’t – whether it’s taking prescription drugs or taking vitamins. , exercise regularly, or eat what they consider to be a healthy diet – researchers must account for this compliance effect or they will most likely infer the wrong answer. They will conclude that this behavior, whatever it is, prevents disease and saves lives, when in reality all they are doing is comparing two different types of people who are, in fact, incomparable.

This phenomenon is a particularly compelling explanation for why the Nurses’ Health Study and other cohort studies have found a benefit of HRT among current users of the drugs, but not necessarily among former users. By distinguishing between women who have never used HRT, those who have used it but then quit, and current users (who were the only ones for whom consistent benefit appeared), these observational studies may have inadvertently focused their focus specifically on, as Jerry Avorn puts it, the “Girl Scouts of the group, the compliant continuing users, who probably do a lot of other preventative things as well. ”

[ad_2]

Related posts:

  1. Health, medicine and therapy for adolescents | Call for Papers
  2. Poppy Days takes place in Mattoon | Health, medicine and fitness
  3. Moderation is the key to tanning | Health, medicine and fitness
  4. Advanced Treatment Options Make Diabetes Management Easier | Health, medicine and fitness
  • Alternative medication
  • Dietary nutrition
  • Dietary supplements
  • Health medicine
  • Medicine price
  • Survey compares how consumers and nutrition experts rate healthy foods – AgriNews
  • Bone & Joint Health Supplements Market to Witness a CAGR of 8% (2022-2028) Driven by Growing Prevalence of Orthopedic Disorders and Micronutrient Deficiencies | UnivDatos Market Overview
  • Police arrest scammer entangling hundreds of IPB students in online loans
  • Know which one is better for nutrition, skin and health
  • Your answers on cancer: What to know about stomach cancer? | Health, Medicine and Fitness
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • March 2010
  • September 2007
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions